Three tiers: Line at $16,000 a month, Plant at $95,000 a month, Enterprise landing between $700k and $9M ACV. Annual prepay carries a 15 to 20 percent discount.
Land on one workflow with a measurable baseline. Expand by line, module and autonomy level. Outcome components available on yield, cullet, defects and energy.
Melting and forming control, annealing control or inspection AI for one line. For glass makers validating ROI on the wedge.
The whole loop: batch and melt, form and shape, anneal and stress, coat and temper, defect, quality and dimension, yield and takt, robotic handling and the twin.
Multi-site glass groups standardising on Glasent, with custom composition, forming and tolerance models.
Modules are licensed per line on the Line tier and bundled on Plant and Enterprise.
| Capability | Line | Plant | Enterprise |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lines covered | 1 | All on site | All in group |
| Products | 1 of 6 | All 6 + 4 scopes | All + custom models |
| Glastwin twin | Not included | Included | Custom models |
| Plant-edge node | Included | Per line | Fleet managed |
| Guarded writes | Scoped tags | All scoped tags | Group policy |
| Ware genealogy | Included | Included | Included + export API |
| Autonomy levels | L1–L2 | L1–L3 | L1–L4 planned |
| SSO / RBAC | Not included | SSO | SSO + tag RBAC |
| Air-gapped deployment | Not included | Optional | Included |
| Support | Business hours | 24/7 | 24/7 + named engineer |
| Model review | Annual | Quarterly | Quarterly per plant |
| Indicative price | $16,000/mo | $95,000/mo | $700k–$9M ACV |
Every Glasent run is an ordered, inspectable sequence. This is scenario_fl2_01 on FL-2 · float line · clear soda-lime: Thickness change FL-2 · 6 mm to 4 mm clear float, residual stress inside spec, zero escaped seeds. It is a worked scenario that shows the shape of a run, not a measured customer result.
Plant Orchestrator · Pulled the 4 mm clear float spec, optical-grade tolerances and the standing energy window from plant MES; locked the target envelope for the run.
Glastwin · Simulated 36 candidate transition recipes across furnace pull, tin-bath ribbon speed and lehr curve; ranked them on seed risk, residual stress and energy per tonne.
Meltrix · Stepped furnace pull toward the new ribbon mass flow while holding melt temperature and fining; chemistry stayed inside the composition window.
Formeon · Raised ribbon speed and re-angled the top rollers to thin the ribbon toward 4 mm; thickness converged inside the design tolerance.
Anneon · Re-shaped the lehr cooling curve for the thinner, faster ribbon so residual stress stays inside spec at the higher speed.
Seedscan · 8 camera, optical and stress stations streaming; a seed cluster flagged at the ribbon edge and attributed to the pull transient, routed to cullet.
Plant Orchestrator · Re-sequenced cut sizes so transition ribbon routes to cullet recovery and good ribbon to the highest-value open order.
Plant Orchestrator · The second pull step exceeded the site autonomy threshold. Held for the glass technologist on shift; approved and written to the audit log.
Panebot · Re-planned pick and stack paths for the thinner panes; plates flagged by Seedscan diverted to cullet, good plates stacked to rack A3.
Plant Orchestrator · Lot released with full genealogy: batch, melt, forming, lehr curve, defect map, stress map and the technologist's approval.
The packaging logic from day one: a low-friction entry on one workflow, expansion by line, module, site and autonomy level, and outcome pricing on the highest-value workflows.
A Line pilot on melting and forming control, annealing control or inspection, with a baseline agreed before shadow mode.
Add the adjacent agent when attribution shows where the next number is. Move to Plant when the loop is worth closing across the site.
Per-ware, per-line and per-action metering above plan limits, plus a share of measured yield, cullet, defect and energy improvement on enterprise deals.
No invented savings. This is the method a pilot uses to decide whether the subscription pays.
These are the numbers the architecture is built to hit and the pilot is built to measure. None is a customer result yet; every pilot report reproduces its figures from the plant's own ware genealogy.
A quick read on where a plant usually lands.
One furnace, forming line or lehr with a clear problem and executive mandate to prove autonomy on a hard KPI.
A plant that has proved one number and wants melt, forming, annealing, inspection, handling and the twin working as one.
A multi-site glass maker wanting one policy model, one audit trail, custom composition and tolerance models and an edge fleet.
Glasent writes to production equipment. Every capability is scoped, every write is policy-checked, and every action is written to an append-only audit log the plant owns.
| Standard | Scope | Status |
|---|---|---|
| SOC 2 Type I | Cloud control plane | RUNNING Planned in the first six months |
| SOC 2 Type II | Cloud control plane | QUEUED Planned in months six to twelve |
| IEC 62443 | Plant-edge OT security | RUNNING Design-aligned |
| ISO 9001 / IATF 16949 | Quality and genealogy records | SUCCEEDED Record formats supported |
| Container and safety-glass standards | Stress and defect conformance records | SUCCEEDED Record formats supported |
No customer quotes yet; we are pre-launch. These are the three buyer personas the product is built for and the pain each one describes, in their own terms.
"The furnace has run for years on the same setpoints. The process never has. We find out a melt drifted when the cullet pile grows."
Plant / operations director · ICP persona
"I can tell you why a check appeared from the lehr curve and the gob weight. I cannot be at every line, and the people who could are retiring."
Glass technologist · ICP persona
"A missed seed is a reject. A missed stress fault is a pane that shatters in the field. I need genealogy on every piece, not a spot check."
Quality / reliability engineer · ICP persona
One policy model, one audit trail, one benchmark across every line in every plant, with the composition and forming models kept private to each site.
Tiers, discounts, outcome components and fit.
One agent module on one forming or annealing line at $16,000 a month: melting and forming control, annealing control or inspection AI, with the plant-edge node, the connectors for that line, the run log and ware genealogy.
When the first line has proved its number and you want the full loop: all six products, the additional coat-and-temper, quality, yield and takt scopes, the orchestrator and the twin across the site, at $95,000 a month.
For the highest-value workflows, yes. Outcome fees are tied to measured yield, cullet, defect, energy and first-pass-quality improvement against the baseline agreed before the pilot.
Annual prepay carries a discount in the 15 to 20 percent range, and multi-year enterprise agreements can ramp usage over time.
Studio and art glass shops with no continuous furnace or forming scope, sites unwilling to integrate furnace, forming or inspection systems under IP and security controls, and buyers who want a dashboard rather than a system that acts.
A historian or SCADA extract, the inspection data you already keep, the grade spec and tolerances, and one KPI you want moved: cullet, seeds and stones, energy per tonne, breakage or escaped-defect risk.
A Line pilot with a pre-agreed baseline is how every plant starts. The report decides what comes next.
↑↓ navigate↵ openesc close
